I don't know what all the fuss is about - especially from the people who say they always input things into the links they click.
I just found out my CARE rating just now - 8/11 I managed.
That's WITH my impatience and hammering of the (x) on FF to shut the millions of MMC links I open. PLUS not actually knowing what CARE/HAT was for pretty much the same amount of time as the complainers >.>
I put 'anything' in the box as a joke - but also because I figured it could be a trick question (since these kind of things usually are, and I didn't realise it was a Yarolds HAT, I thought it was a new link) so I figured I'd stick with what was working
I don't think it's that big of a deal, if you miss them you miss them. If you always, always click every link you need to enter additional information into, you shouldn't have missed the HATs surely? Heck, I only usually click them - sometimes I'm in a rush, or I miss them, or the page doesn't load properly and I'm too frustrated to refresh the page. And I'm still over the limit.
I'll prolly get my head bitten off for this, but I just don't think it's that much of a problem It's definitely being blown out of all proportions...
Besides, what about the people who never click the additional input links like doorgaan or whatever, but know about the HATs and remember to input data for them? They'll still be stealing people's credits just because they have the good sense to enter the right information on the HATs. It's a profoundly flawed system, but not one to get your panties in a bunch over >.>
Test of Human Comprehension, in abbreviated form ИЧО - a magnificent thing. It is called to help the players playing games who demand additional actions from кликеров, to not lose the credits as a result of actions безбашенных кликеров (and such here the majority). This all would be remarkable, only is made is not transparent, without due explanatories.
I have suffered as not the English-speaking participant.
Up to me it reached as a giraffe more than week.
But what to do. In Russian I clever and sharp. In English - a drunk snail.
At me and in ideas was not, that something will be made, that will limit access to references without the due prior notification.
And in general in my opinion, ИЧО - absolutely useless thing for players. Earlier from them stole credits. Now кликеров. If the Administration would like to make for them something really useful would allocate the references demanding additional вмещательства, in separate section. With all explanations and recommendations.
It's not perfect, but it gets the general gist of the thing. If you do not understand English, use a translation site rather than ********** about it >.> It will give you enough comprehension to be able to understand what is required of you.
Это не прекрасно, но это получает общую суть вещи. Если Вы не понимаете английский язык, используйте участок перевода вместо того, чтобы скулить об этом>.> Это даст Вам достаточно понимания, чтобы быть в состоянии понять то, что требуется из Вас.
I was only trying to help >.> It frustrates me when people use the language barrier as an excuse is all, I'm sorry if I came across as aggressive or offensive.
Personally I am very happy with the site in general and have no problem with HAT/CARE.
I do kind of think one thing would help eliminate the only valid complaint (in my mind)-
Instead of replacing a clicked link with HAT, simply insert HAT as an ADDITIONAL click when warranted.
And for those who think you are wasting their time-
Maybe HAT could be beaten (with the solution changing when solved) & points awarded for the correct solution. (I don't know if that would make a lot more work for you)
I admit I did NOT read all this thread, I just don't have the time. If these ideas have already been discussed forgive me.
ANYWAY - I support you. I think you are trying to be fair to everyone. I also think that for a FREE SERVICE you have done a great job! Keep on trying, I for one appreciate what I've been given.
I don't understand what all the fuss is about! The loss of a click? The added time to do a HAT? The "intrusion" by Yarolds into the way we use Yarolds?
Hey, I come here for FUN! I met people here I really like to chat & spend some time with doing competitions and the like. NONE of THAT has changed. The icing on the cake - my cities and critters get hundreds of clicks a day! ALL THAT COST ME NOTHING.
Service (free of charge especially) without community is nothing. Interests of community are necessary to be taken into account. When laudations are audible only, and who is displeased at that specify to a door, it disturbs me…
In fact obviously, problems are present and they are not decided.
For example, HAT is some strange decision.
We all must help to find the best decisions.
Helped: 4 times Age: 43 Joined: 05 Jun 2008 Posts: 295 Location: Wichita, KS USA
Posted: Fri Jul 25, 2008 5:48 pm Re: Two ideas
Starfighter wrote:
Free cheese is only in a mousetrap. It's a joke.
Service (free of charge especially) without community is nothing. Interests of community are necessary to be taken into account. When laudations are audible only, and who is displeased at that specify to a door, it disturbs me…
In fact obviously, problems are present and they are not decided.
For example, HAT is some strange decision.
We all must help to find the best decisions.
I do think that the admins have admitted that this wasn't the best solution to the problem, and that they're open to looking into fixing what's broken with it. However, given all of the other great stuff that's been going on with the site lately, I'm inclined to give them a little break and let them pick it up when they can really focus on doing it right.
I do kind of think one thing would help eliminate the only valid complaint (in my mind)-
Instead of replacing a clicked link with HAT, simply insert HAT as an ADDITIONAL click when warranted.
I do not understand this part, can explain in more detail? Where to insert additional click?
I think some people are saying that when their link is clicked, instead of their link opening, a HAT opens. And this would possibly cost them a click. I suggested as a solution to this problem that their link AND a HAT open.
Helped: 4 times Age: 43 Joined: 05 Jun 2008 Posts: 295 Location: Wichita, KS USA
Posted: Sat Jul 26, 2008 12:15 am
Jeff wrote:
Hi Rikiki!
I think some people are saying that when their link is clicked, instead of their link opening, a HAT opens. And this would possibly cost them a click. I suggested as a solution to this problem that their link AND a HAT open.
Jeff
it doesn't cost them a click. The link that would have opened is still available if you refresh the page and the clicker can click it again. Then it could charge a credit.
You cannot post new topics in this forum You cannot reply to topics in this forum You cannot edit your posts in this forum You cannot delete your posts in this forum You cannot vote in polls in this forum You cannot attach files in this forum You can download files in this forum
It's definitely being blown out of all proportions...
