Age: 40 Joined: 06 May 2009 Posts: 13 Location: Bonn
Posted: Fri May 08, 2009 3:03 pm
sounds like a real great idea, but there have to be some rules to it...
to avoid the pressure from other dyns, those new categories should not be able to click and be clicked by allied dyns. if you would not implement this, nothing would change with those new ranks
but in fact its a great idea. so not every member has to leave just because of holidays
hopefully there will be not to many missuse coming out of this
Joined: 11 Jan 2009 Posts: 61 Location: Philadelphia, Pa USA
Posted: Sat May 09, 2009 2:01 am
Members do not have to leave because of illness, holidays, etc. If they
let the Emperor or Kampaku of their dynasty know--they can be moved to peasant
status. Peasant status does not count towards the dynasty averages. In
my dynasty (Twilight Clickers), and dynasties I have been in in the past,
and the dynasties in my alliance---people put ithe info in their sn--and all is well.
Please don't give heini a warning for posting on a thread that has been dead for well
over 2 weeks. It was posted here for heini to go to that thread.
I have done it when I feel that any member is in difficulty. Put it with the status Peasant.
But I have noticed that the new members, or members of other countries, have difficulty in understanding this process.
When we pass a shogun or daimyo for Peasant status, they feel discredit.
Sit back demoted and eventually abandoned when the dynasty.
And also get email from other emperors in alliance protesting the peasant negative.
And cancel alliance.
This confuses.
We are foreigners. Not dominate the English language.
Contact with members via e-mail in different languages, is difficult.
You must have options to make life easier for all peoples of the world.
The site is universal.
I agree to keep the traditions of the names today, but that does not preclude any other technical options to keep the members in the dynasty without the need to exclude them.
That is cause for cancellation of alliances.
Today could be in my dynasty with more than twenty members, but had to delete most of them because of pressure from other dynasties in alliances.
Joined: 11 Jan 2009 Posts: 61 Location: Philadelphia, Pa USA
Posted: Sat May 09, 2009 6:17 pm
How many days had your members been negative?
I've seen the same people day after day, week after
week, be negative. I have watched them float from
dynasty to dynasty------and they are always negative!
That's ridiculous. Many dynasties have 'mentors' that
help those negative people. It does get to a point where
those negative people do not deserve to be in a dynasty.
They click away--but provide not 1 link for any one to click.
That defeats the purpose of even being in a dynasty to begin
with.
I have 1 ore 2 people in dynasty that don't know haw to open the mail's , sow I can't communicate with them
I'm truing to do all my members positives but I suppose it is impossible because some tell me that this is an exchange site and they just want to exchange clicks others don't understand what I have to tell them
then the difficulty of the languages
people prom Poland, Russia, Portugal, Holland, ....
and some without knowing the English
Age: 51 Joined: 13 Jan 2006 Posts: 1541 Location: Australia
Posted: Tue May 12, 2009 10:43 am
In short, im against this. Your essentially dictating that links in dynasty must be on & not in main. If its in main & they can keep the credits up why force them to change.
On the subject of this being an English language site, if people are serious they will translate anything they dont understand. Let the member/s concerned make that choice, do not force how links are to be done (from the sites perspective). What you ask of them when in your dynasty is up to you
_________________ Do it Legit. You break the rules, don't expect a pleasant outcome
“You are not entitled to your opinion. You are entitled to your informed opinion. No one is entitled to be ignorant.”
Proudly the Emperor of The MOB. The oldest surviving & most successful large dynasty
Joined: 27 Aug 2008 Posts: 45 Location: Pittsburgh PA USA
Posted: Tue May 12, 2009 11:56 am
amatario wrote:
You must have options to make life easier for all peoples of the world.
The site is universal.
I agree to keep the traditions of the names today, but that does not preclude any other technical options to keep the members in the dynasty without the need to exclude them.
That is cause for cancellation of alliances.
Today could be in my dynasty with more than twenty members, but had to delete most of them because of pressure from other dynasties in alliances.
A lot of people bounce around from dynasty to dynasty and are always negative. Why keep them when it is obvious they won't even attempt to stay positive and no reworking of this site will get them to stay positive. I've seen several people that are always negative but are always in a dynasty so it isn't as if they are being deprived of being in a dynasty. My thinking is that if you can figure out how to sign up at Yarold's and then join a dynasty, you should easily be able to figure out how to stay positive.
One point I see that you are overlooking is that when a dynasty forms an alliance with another dynasty, the emperors of the two dynasties are agreeing to each other that there will be an exchange of links between the two dynasties. You talk about fairness however if you as Emperor are collecting a group of people which can't be clicked on, you are being unfair to the dynasties you allied with if they are staying positive for you.
An occasional negative here and there is acceptable and understandable to just about everyone but when it gets to something like a third or more of the dynasty who can't be clicked because of negative and hidden links and it is always the same people, that is not understandable nor acceptable, at least to me.
Age: 56 Joined: 10 Mar 2007 Posts: 1937 Location: Netherlands
Posted: Tue May 12, 2009 11:59 am
malbus wrote:
amatario wrote:
You must have options to make life easier for all peoples of the world.
The site is universal.
I agree to keep the traditions of the names today, but that does not preclude any other technical options to keep the members in the dynasty without the need to exclude them.
That is cause for cancellation of alliances.
Today could be in my dynasty with more than twenty members, but had to delete most of them because of pressure from other dynasties in alliances.
malbus wrote:
One point I see that you are overlooking is that when a dynasty forms an alliance with another dynasty, the emperors of the two dynasties are agreeing to each other that there will be an exchange of links between the two dynasties. You talk about fairness however if you as Emperor are collecting a group of people which can't be clicked on, you are being unfair to the dynasties you allied with if they are staying positive for you.
You cannot post new topics in this forum You cannot reply to topics in this forum You cannot edit your posts in this forum You cannot delete your posts in this forum You cannot vote in polls in this forum You cannot attach files in this forum You can download files in this forum