First and foremost, this is a click exchange, not who can horde the most in game currency. It is only fair to show where you want to click. When the rule was implemented, there were many more links available to click, now, it is back to a few. To solve the long waiting times the cheaters' links can be made to cost more credits than it is worth, as done before. People who have genuine long waiting period links can be distinguished in that they only have that particular type of link in their profile or that they show that type of link everywhere. They do not have one type of link shown in one place and another type of link in another place. There are plenty of games on many different sites that let you be the best or top of whatever you want to be; this is not one of them. This is a click exchange.
Oh I voted before reading the posts - disregard my vote too - 1 less yes.
I am showing a link on main but should I be forced I wouldn't - I don't like force or restrictions.
Edit: if you're looking for a reason the clicks has gone down - it's the new scoring system - it's so boring as a budget meeting: You sit with the calculator and check your profile: Do I need to show more links and if so how much limit? or am I even?
Half my links haven't been out since this scoring system started I break even so why show more? Many of my members clicks around or just above 400 - that's what they get clicked in dynasty with their 1 link showing so why show more?
Last edited by Jeanne on Tue Sep 15, 2009 5:56 am; edited 1 time in total
Helped: 2 times Age: 56 Joined: 10 Mar 2007 Posts: 1937 Location: Netherlands
Posted: Tue Sep 15, 2009 5:18 am
Why everyone is making a account on yarolds?
they are making a account on a link exchange site.
so what do you do here? exchange links
I think it is not understandeble when someone click other links and not show their own link. So my opinon is show your link, click other links and when your credits are zero, thats bad for you becouse your link get no clicks, that means work harder, or accept that you get no more clicks.
Yes you must show your link on the place where you click other links
I'm with Jeanne, I don't lke to be forced. And lately I haven't been showng links in main lately is because of the poor follow through rate. When I show my link, I expect to be clcked all the way through, not have people click my link and don't do anything on it. And if if the min clicks are used in calculation. I only show extras to make it even with the amount I clicked. Not gonna show more than I've been clicked n dyn. Not worth the effort. And lately I noticed that there wasn't any links even in dyn. Probably due to the new system, people aren't showing more than they've clicked. Nope not a single link
Last edited by bluebell_rose on Tue Sep 15, 2009 11:48 pm; edited 1 time in total
Helped: 2 times Age: 48 Joined: 06 May 2008 Posts: 407
Posted: Tue Sep 15, 2009 8:32 am
Ella wrote:
I support the rule to have at least 1 link shown in main and history if you want to click on that page.
So, if i understand correct, i herewith have voted 'yes'
Yes, and I voted NO because I read the sentence wrong.....
I said NO to deleting the rule instead of yes to support the rule.
(which both is the same but counts other way round)
Well .... I hope, that my wrong vote does not make problems now
Joined: 09 Jun 2008 Posts: 241 Location: North Carolina, USA
Posted: Tue Sep 15, 2009 12:03 pm
I voted yes, but do not see why history would need to be included.
I use the same link for main & dynasty so if you can't click on one page ( not in my alliance), you're able to get the click on the other. Only my allies will see my extras--on our dynasty page----otherwise, why have allies if they aren't "special"?
I voted no because I prefer to manage ratio myself (as I do since 2nd update).
I don't think I penalize others by this way.
I just try to balance done/received
If I can't make enought (few hours before reset) I remove my link to "main"
On the other hand , if I have more done than receive I let link and share few others extra links before reset.
Isn't it a faithful share?
Edit: sorry , I was tired yesterday and maybe said nosense.
With "yes" or "no" , if we can unmark what we want when we want , it doesn't change something anymore for me.(I remove "main" link when I go to bed so I don't need to use "main" for click in this time).
Last edited by bodisson-2 on Wed Sep 16, 2009 7:07 am; edited 1 time in total
I voted yes. I support the rule. Like most, I actually WANT clicks onto my game and I get more follow-through clicks on Main...so I have a link there. However, since this rule is not enforced, I am getting LESS follow-throughs and more clicks on my game.
i sincerely dont know. i mean its fair that if youre showing your link you can click others and the opposite, but also as it has been said - if someone already clicks my link in dynasty or history, they dont need to see it in main..
other thing - if there is the possibility to have your main clicked only if you show main, i thing for some ppl it will loose sense to be a part of a dynasty.
and third - i agree with dunno who wrote it here . that ppl with interactive links wont waste their credits, or better said - when you have too many links there are ppl who dont upgrade whatever the links need and just close the windows, taking care of hat only. i have a mmc so im fine, not loosing credits, but i can understand that others do which is unfair, no??
thats why i dont know if im for yes or no.. no is better for all i think.. dunno...
Joined: 09 Mar 2008 Posts: 18 Location: Ottawa, Canada
Posted: Wed Sep 16, 2009 4:56 am
I voted Yes. It only makes sense that you should show a link on the page that you're clicking on because after all it is a click exchange. It's also important to note that while the rule was in place there were far more clicks available
You cannot post new topics in this forum You cannot reply to topics in this forum You cannot edit your posts in this forum You cannot delete your posts in this forum You cannot vote in polls in this forum You cannot attach files in this forum You can download files in this forum