[Yarold]

Checking if it was that bad. Explanations welcome as always.

[DemonicJ]

Do you mean "do we support the rule" or Do we support it being deleted"?

[Yarold]

Do you support ... rule?

[DemonicJ]

then disregard how I answered the poll

I less no, but as Jeanne has voted yes in error its now balanced out

[City of MT]

First and foremost, this is a click exchange, not who can horde the most in game currency. It is only fair to show where you want to click. When the rule was implemented, there were many more links available to click, now, it is back to a few. To solve the long waiting times the cheaters' links can be made to cost more credits than it is worth, as done before. People who have genuine long waiting period links can be distinguished in that they only have that particular type of link in their profile or that they show that type of link everywhere. They do not have one type of link shown in one place and another type of link in another place. There are plenty of games on many different sites that let you be the best or top of whatever you want to be; this is not one of them. This is a click exchange.

[Ella]

I support the rule to have at least 1 link shown in main and history if you want to click on that page.

So, if i understand correct, i herewith have voted 'yes'

[Jeanne]

Oh I voted before reading the posts - disregard my vote too - 1 less yes.

I am showing a link on main but should I be forced I wouldn't - I don't like force or restrictions.


Edit: if you're looking for a reason the clicks has gone down - it's the new scoring system - it's so boring as a budget meeting: You sit with the calculator and check your profile: Do I need to show more links and if so how much limit? or am I even?

Half my links haven't been out since this scoring system started I break even so why show more? Many of my members clicks around or just above 400 - that's what they get clicked in dynasty with their 1 link showing so why show more?

[Ferrari]

Why everyone is making a account on yarolds?
they are making a account on a link exchange site.
so what do you do here? exchange links
I think it is not understandeble when someone click other links and not show their own link. So my opinon is show your link, click other links and when your credits are zero, thats bad for you becouse your link get no clicks, that means work harder, or accept that you get no more clicks.
Yes you must show your link on the place where you click other links

[Namilee]

When I want to to click these sites I show a link or two,depends on my sumup.

But since I don't like to be forced,too I agree with Jeanne.

This is a tiny YES.

Have a nice day!

[dorville]

Yes, I support the idea. This is an exchange site and exchange means "give and take"

[bluebell_rose]

I'm with Jeanne, I don't lke to be forced. And lately I haven't been showng links in main lately is because of the poor follow through rate. When I show my link, I expect to be clcked all the way through, not have people click my link and don't do anything on it. And if if the min clicks are used in calculation. I only show extras to make it even with the amount I clicked. Not gonna show more than I've been clicked n dyn. Not worth the effort. And lately I noticed that there wasn't any links even in dyn. Probably due to the new system, people aren't showing more than they've clicked. Nope not a single link

[Roman]

[bubika]

voted YES too

[thepossum1]

I voted yes, but do not see why history would need to be included.

I use the same link for main & dynasty so if you can't click on one page ( not in my alliance), you're able to get the click on the other. Only my allies will see my extras--on our dynasty page----otherwise, why have allies if they aren't "special"?

[Dannic2002]

I support the rule that if you want to click links you must have a link visible for what you click.

And perhaps one that says you cant make a link visible just for the time you want to click.

Dan

[bodisson-2]

I voted no because I prefer to manage ratio myself (as I do since 2nd update).
I don't think I penalize others by this way.
I just try to balance done/received
If I can't make enought (few hours before reset) I remove my link to "main"
On the other hand , if I have more done than receive I let link and share few others extra links before reset.
Isn't it a faithful share?

Edit: sorry , I was tired yesterday and maybe said nosense.
With "yes" or "no" , if we can unmark what we want when we want , it doesn't change something anymore for me.(I remove "main" link when I go to bed so I don't need to use "main" for click in this time).

[iFly]

I voted yes. I support the rule. Like most, I actually WANT clicks onto my game and I get more follow-through clicks on Main...so I have a link there. However, since this rule is not enforced, I am getting LESS follow-throughs and more clicks on my game.

[Tuleria]

I voted yes. This is a exchange site, right? So you show links and click links!

[misunkyno]

i sincerely dont know. i mean its fair that if youre showing your link you can click others and the opposite, but also as it has been said - if someone already clicks my link in dynasty or history, they dont need to see it in main..

other thing - if there is the possibility to have your main clicked only if you show main, i thing for some ppl it will loose sense to be a part of a dynasty.

and third - i agree with dunno who wrote it here . that ppl with interactive links wont waste their credits, or better said - when you have too many links there are ppl who dont upgrade whatever the links need and just close the windows, taking care of hat only. i have a mmc so im fine, not loosing credits, but i can understand that others do which is unfair, no??

thats why i dont know if im for yes or no.. no is better for all i think.. dunno...

[Chillaxville]

I voted Yes. It only makes sense that you should show a link on the page that you're clicking on because after all it is a click exchange. It's also important to note that while the rule was in place there were far more clicks available