Search found 50 matches

and again a not working hat

Had a not working HAT a few minutes ago. Made it right after opening about 10-20 links, so no time-out possible.
"I have nothing for you"

ItÂ´s still only a few hours, so I guess they just didnÂ´t see it till now. Maybe they want to sleep at night, too

edit: lol, wrote it and got also my not working hat a few seconds later.

edit2: well, seems that there was also another problem: the last time (maybe 2 days ago) I saw only 5 missed HATs, now there are 8, but I use every HAT normally.

I know the people are giving much more negative than positive feedback, because when someone has a problem, he wants it to be solved and when all is working, he doesnÂ´t feel a need to "work" by writing it down.

But in sum, there are more positive things on working sites, as negative ones. Else there would be no users. And Yarolds SWLE is definitely working.
I want to say thanks to the admin(s), mods and support for your work on this site and for helping the users.

To all others: If you feel like it, you can also write your comment here!

Thanks

What are the current limitations? How much mails saved at all and how much in each section?

local time = server time

Grandpa, now I understand, what you meant. So with your formula you get the average over all days. And I thought about an average over only a definite number of days, like 10.
For all days, your formula is correct of course.

I would make the sum of the last 10 days divided by 10, because an overall-average brings some problems. What if you have clicked for a year and there was in your dynasty only the chance to get for example about 200 average and then you could make about 600. Another one joins just when the change happenes and even after a year, you could only have 400 and he allready after the first day 600.

For dynasty average it could be basically the same:

For each day is an average calculated:
All clicks divided by the number of members
And then the averages of the last 10 days are summed and divided by 10.

Also possible, but I dont like it so much:
the averages of all members just summed and divided by the number of members.

But the first mentioned method would be more dynamical, faster and more accurate. It would not give you less average, if you let a new one join the dynasty.

To the idea with only members clicked instead of links clicked:
I like the old idea here more.
With the new method, all dynasties would say "you have to show a link everytime, have credits and click all links" and then it is only a question of the number of members in the dynasty+allies.

Cant find myselfe there. Too tired now, so maybe just blind^^

only as an example with a 3 days period:

1: 40
2: 40
3: 46
4: 50
5:

day 3 ave:
(40+40+46)/3 = 42
day 4 ave:
(40+46+50)/3 = 45,3
(2*42 + 50)/3 = 44,6

So the only REAL average is made by saving the number of clicks of all 10 days and dividing them by 10. (day1 + day2 + ... + day3) / 10

(9*old_ave + today_clicked)/10 is no average, it is just a filter algorithm, which is normally used to reduce for example the signal noise of a measurement.

Yes, I am the same opinion Wildthing.
A defined number of slots, which only reset at the selected time or 24h.

I only don´t want to miss the selectable time option.

I allready voted.
Just wanted to say, that I also really like our current banner (The one from baileys short notes)

I vote for:
10 21 20

You have good ideas and make good banners from it

I don´t know much about this, so I can only compliment you on making so good ones.

But if you do so, plz not default disabled, as some would like to see if the links are working correct.

Why not let the emp (and shoguns) decide, if he wants to remove him if he is inactive for a longer time?
Will the link still be shown, if I don´t log in for 10, 20, 30, 40 days? When is my account deleted? I think as we earned the credits by clicking and some also bought them, there should not be anything like that you have to log in, that the credits are helping you gaining clicks on the links.
I am a little confused, but maybe the link is still shown and there is no need to worry?

"I'm afraid that's very easy to be abused when it can be switched on and off all the time."

How could this be abused?

If you check it off, you don´t see this action required links like doorgan, enter number and so on.
If you check it to "Yes", you would see this links and some of them are tests, too. So they don´t know which one is a game and which is a test(when tests are made like the games) and would have to make the action to not being rated below the 25%.