SWLE Forum Index
FAQ  Search  Memberlist  Usergroups  Register  Log in  Album  Download
Search found 12 matches
SWLE Forum Index
Author Message
  Topic: stirred, not shaken update
sks

Replies: 124
Views: 66508

PostForum: Support - Ask here   Posted: Wed Sep 02, 2009 10:22 pm   Subject: stirred, not shaken update
thank you very much
  Topic: stirred, not shaken update
sks

Replies: 124
Views: 66508

PostForum: Support - Ask here   Posted: Wed Sep 02, 2009 5:58 pm   Subject: stirred, not shaken update
Yarold wrote:

Quote:
now you forced me to remove my link from "main" coz i'm not going to feed the fake hoteliers with my credits....

Please explain me how it was more fair when you were clicked by people who only showed link on dynasty page, where you didnt have any access.

i've never said it was more fair...this is the same....i pay a lot of credits to be clicked by ppl i can't click back... not important if it's because they don't show the link or show link with 2hrs waiting time (creating just to be able to click in main/history).... before it was even better coz i could click those who clicked me at least in history which i can't now without showing link ALSO there....so finally yes i have to say it was more fair for me before


Yarold wrote:
Quote:
4. why is the box for "links" in "customize" not set to be checked by default, is this also to help the "main" exchange?

It is because you checked that by yourself.

well i'm sure i didn't. coz i came today and see no links in "main" then came to profile where was checked the box for dynasty and "main"...i had to uncheck both and check them back.....

why don't you answer my other questions, please? especially what problem was with total-clicks-done/received statistics that they had to be removed?

i also asked (i copied them so you needn't search for those questions):

1. how this change helps to eliminate so called feeder dynasties?
2. how the removing of total-clicks-done and total-clicks-received statistics helped to eliminate "feeder" dynasties or to see more links in "main"?
3. what reason is to have a "history" when i have to show there a link to click someone who already clicked me? is there then a difference between "history" and "main"?
5. where can be found the explanations for all that new columns?

thanks in advance
  Topic: stirred, not shaken update
sks

Replies: 124
Views: 66508

PostForum: Support - Ask here   Posted: Wed Sep 02, 2009 2:36 pm   Subject: stirred, not shaken update
well as always.....instead of simple change (for example like i suggested here http://yarold.eu/phpBB2/v...er=asc&start=60 you again decided to punish common members.... instead of trying to help the members you made all harder for them.... insteda of trying to solve the problem with "action links" you made so called human awareness test (lmao) which helps nothing just annoys... and now? instead of solving the problems with so called feeder dynasties and (finally) the problem with links in "main" you made this....thing... since i've joined i almost always showed my link in "main", even as a non-vip, now you forced me to remove my link from "main" coz i'm not going to feed the fake hoteliers with my credits.... (btw. i suggest you the phantasy rpg game, much more helpfull!)
really thanks for helping me with my game.....!
there is only one reason to stay for me, the friends i found here. be sure it's not the link exchange...those <5% of valid clicks i receive for my my-brute link i can get on hydra too or maybe even by spamming my contacts on icq....

at the end, can someone explain me, please:
1. how this change helps to eliminate so called feeder dynasties?
2. how the removing of total-clicks-done and total-clicks-received statistics helped to eliminate "feeder" dynasties or to see more links in "main"?
3. what reason is to have a "history" when i have to show there a link to click someone who already clicked me? is there then a difference between "history" and "main"?
4. why is the box for "links" in "customize" not set to be checked by default, is this also to help the "main" exchange?
5. where can be found the explanations for all that new columns?
  Topic: stirred, not shaken update
sks

Replies: 124
Views: 66508

PostForum: Support - Ask here   Posted: Wed Sep 02, 2009 9:21 am   Subject: stirred, not shaken update
Ferrari wrote:
:evil:

I was so proud of my stats , when i went to registerd members and clicked ''most clicks done'' to saw Ferrari on 1st place in that yarold page... and now all stats are gone........


exactly!! what problem was with all time stats?? :evil:
you stole all the time i spent here...... :evil:

looks like my time here comes close to the end.....
  Topic: Way dynasties work
sks

Replies: 136
Views: 104239

PostForum: Dynasty Discussion   Posted: Thu Aug 27, 2009 1:58 pm   Subject: Way dynasties work
Jeanne wrote:

Oh I meant all links show on main, the display in dynasty option should be removed - anything else would be unfair to those who has legitimate extra links.


yes this is what i suggest... link(s) should be displayed only in link exchange.
thx jeanne ;)


(o.t.: limits look to be set well at this time, change is not needed i think)
  Topic: Way dynasties work
sks

Replies: 136
Views: 104239

PostForum: Dynasty Discussion   Posted: Wed Aug 26, 2009 12:40 pm   Subject: Way dynasties work
i really don't understand why, when some problem occurs, there are always so many ppl asking for more restrictions...... it's always the same: someone finds a pass through the rules to help his dynasty, then some ppl jump up asking a forbidding of this and that and finally the rules are changed. even though the problem is always caused by a small group of members (and always and only members of dynasty/ies), changed rules "punish" thousands of members regardless they have ever been in a dynasty or not. so now we for example have to wait till reset with changing/adding/removing link(s) or to have limited space for links in profiles.... and now i see there are ppl here asking for even more mass punishment................ do you really think this is the right way?

but to the topic:
my suggestion is simple, just allow the links to be displayed only in the link exchange page. in my opinion it will fix problems with "feeder" dynasties (it is a little different to show 10 links all the day for 60 ppl or for 6.000 ppl, esp. when part of those 6k are "enemies") without more restrictions, changing rules or so. maybe even the old restrictions could have been removed then. also this will hurt (if) only members in dynasties, not all others having nothing to do with this.... and as a bonus this will fix also the problem with the link exchange section which is more and more useless.
other possibility i see, is to end dynasty competition completely, letting the dynasties to be just the "discussion clubs for friends" or so... because dynasties just cause problems and hurt the exchange of links here at all.

thanks for reading.
  Topic: Admins who are also emp's or dynasty leaders
sks

Replies: 61
Views: 35092

PostForum: Dynasty Discussion   Posted: Sat Jun 13, 2009 5:36 pm   Subject: Admins who are also emp's or dynasty leaders
Jeanne wrote:
Did anyone have a problem with Frank (Metalteo) running his dynasty? Does anyone have a problem with Bella running it now?

be sure i really don't care about the names of admins and it isn't personal, at least from my side. and since i noticed that you joined in september 08, let me show you few quotes from july of the same year ;)
Quote:
Quote:
It looks to me after reading this top messages several times,that the brilliant ADMIN in Gamers Alliance have difficulties finding friendly dynasty's with lotsa!! members,so now they need to do this

Quote:
A very sad and manipulative way to try to help Gamers Alliance achieve what it has never been able to achieve,namely- a loyal and dedicated following.Maybe you should spend more time looking in the mirror.

Quote:
This gives the impression that the site admins' dynasties can't compete so they're changing the rules to make themselves more competitive.


i could show you more, but i'm lazy to search and read old topics :mrgreen:
so you can see that this has nothing to do with a concrete person. accusations come every time when people feel to be traited or hurt or even cheated (regardless if they are right or not).
imho the best solution is to have neutral admins which are not members of any dynasty. otherwise this situation will come back again and again time to time.... well, why not to pay them? isn't it possible? i'm sure they deserve it for their work.


Jeanne wrote:
Sure they can use the "powers" they have also to benefit their dynasty/members and as Emp I would like to have the same abilities sometimes (when a member by accident leaves his/her links open and logg off I could enter the profile and turn them off before the member went negative - or has a "bad" SN - I could edit it) but who among you wouldn't do the same if you had the ability?

i'm sure you are joking... otherwise i hope you will not become an admin here :razz:
  Topic: Admins who are also emp's or dynasty leaders
sks

Replies: 61
Views: 35092

PostForum: Dynasty Discussion   Posted: Sat Jun 13, 2009 11:14 am   Subject: Admins who are also emp's or dynasty leaders
bluebell_rose wrote:
We love jay.


yes. this is exactly what i wrote about. many love him and many hate him. many think about his motivation every time he does anything... i'm far to judge where the truth is, who is a "victim" and who is an "offender" and i have to say i don't care much, i'm just an ordinary clicker. only what i want to say is, that, in my humble opinion, for the site would be better to have an admin who would cause less emotions - less loved and less hated admin. more neutral person who will calm down the quarrels instead of causing them with his every second decision (again, doesn't matter if he is right or not; maybe even worse when he is....).
well maybe i'm strange or naive or both, but by me, admins generally shouldn't be loved or hated, just respected....


DemonicJ wrote:
People will come & people will go, whether they pay or not. If they are leaving because of an admins actions, maybe they should be looking at why admins are constantly removing their short notes, posts in forums, multi accounts or adding warnings & even bans (both in the forum & on the exchange site). Admins are here to make sure the rules are followed & to take appropriate action to rectify things that arent.

no problem with it. my post had nothing to do with work of admins.
  Topic: Admins who are also emp's or dynasty leaders
sks

Replies: 61
Views: 35092

PostForum: Dynasty Discussion   Posted: Sat Jun 13, 2009 8:42 am   Subject: Admins who are also emp's or dynasty leaders
well...i thought this topic is for general discussion about possible "conflict of interests" when admins participate in a competition.... looks like i was wrong, probably due to my insufficient knowledge of english language. then sorry, my post was off-topic.

nevertheless, after i've read all three pages of posts, i have to ask one question:
is it useful for the site to have an admin who divides the community, causes members (even paying ones) leave or even causes personal attacks between other members?
  Topic: Admins who are also emp's or dynasty leaders
sks

Replies: 61
Views: 35092

PostForum: Dynasty Discussion   Posted: Wed Jun 10, 2009 10:37 am   Subject: Admins who are also emp's or dynasty leaders
Jeff wrote:
Is there anyone else on this site that perceives a possible problem with site admins also running dynasties?


i always thought i'm the only one who see this as a problem. i was very surprised when i joined this site about the fact that admins also participate in the competition here....for me it's a typical example of "a conflict of interests". it's like the referees having their own team in a football league they judge.......
as emps they must work for their dynasties, that's clear... but since they are admins at the same time, all actions they do to help own dynasty are automatically suspicious, regardless of the real reasons they had for it. even if you have the nicest, the most honest and the most rightful person in the world on this position, the doubts will last...and since there is probably not the best person in the world here, the doubts are logically propagationately bigger....

in my opinion, this state is not good for transparency and trustworthiness of admins' decisions, for a legal certainty of the members and, not in the last row, also for admins... as they are still under the suspicion of abusing their power in favor of own dynasties.

of course, i understand that those ppl came here as common members and they were active, more active and then became mods or even admins and they want to play as they did it before.... and i also understand that will be much harder to find ppl who wants to be admins, if they will not be able to run a dynasty. especially when i have to say that i don't see a big difference between "admin-emp", "admin-kampaku" or i.e. "admin-shogun"...

so yes it can cause a dilemma, but i personally prefer the neutrality of admins...it would prevent many misunderstandings, quarrels and wraths.


Roman wrote:
(...) if you talk about diassalowing Admins to be Emp of a Dynasty you also would need to do that for Moderators, like I am.

yes it would be better, but there is a small difference.... when moderator, even the global one ;) , abuses his power, you can still appeal to admins as to a "higher instance". when admin abuses his power, you can appeal maybe to the train-station :mrgreen: so if there would be neutral admins, the mods could be tolerated, because the members will then trust to fair higher instance....
  Topic: Losing credits
sks

Replies: 14
Views: 7756

PostForum: Support - Ask here   Posted: Wed Jan 14, 2009 9:22 pm   Subject: Losing credits
Solrayne wrote:
I WOULD ask WHY...???

Draining 5 credits EACH time for ONE click is ABSURD (I have a much better word for it, but it shouldn't be posted publicly)...


i totally agree with you... it's really ABSURD
it should be at least 50 credits per click....
  Topic: Dynasties
sks

Replies: 90
Views: 53065

PostForum: Support - Ask here   Posted: Fri Jul 11, 2008 9:34 am   Subject: Dynasties
wow....really really great!!!

after many nice updates like limits or counting clicks now coming the best one....
are you working hard to be better than others? nice we will punish you for that!
let's come together into grey average....

what's that?? way to communism!!
("my neighbour has nice cow....but i won't to have such my own....i want his one will die....")

bah :evil:


sks

p.s. this is a problem: "Error, one of frames didnt load (0)"........... not number of members in dynasties.....
 
Jump to:  

Powered by phpBB modified by Przemo © 2003 phpBB Group
Akagahara style created by Nash modified v0.8 by warna