Search found 10 matches

I didn't know dynasties could invite people :lol:

I know the happenings of admin DemonicJ so no need to explain anything like that as I am admin at one of the games on here along with a few other sites that have no bearing with here.

I agree about the point of view of the activity however by opinion I meant as in that single persons view of the rules as it is not being explained well at all.

One person per account is completely impossible to regulate as it would come down to opinion at the end of the day and people in "power" should not make decisions using that medium of thought.

I have seen someone post on here about being banned for him and his gf having an account each before yet in here you say it is allowed? Make your minds up and word the rules correctly in each language as "Do not make multiple accounts. Only one per person is allowed." clearly states one account per person so the rules have clearly lost something in the translation. Clear the rules up, as the rules in English are flawed and open to massive misconception (which is why people are misunderstanding the rules and getting banned for not understanding incomprensible rules).

I reiterate my point: The rules are not clearly written and need rewriting before you attempt to enforce the rules again.

I posted about this before in the suggestion thread and what was given as a tip here is not a fix by any means but merely an attempt to gloss over a problem. All banned members need to be hidden from click pages as they make a mess of the lists for nearly an entire day and simply ignoring it will not make it go away.

Quite simply as a dynasty it would be more fruitful to know each other and build up a community-like system in the dynasty.

My name is

and I'm a 29 year old year computer scientist from the UK who online games whilst bored at home (I work from home). I play via steam normally as I cannot abide the concept of the shoddy paperweight they call the 360 but I do possess a Wii as I am a massive retro gamer.

Your turn?

Does this apply to every thread though? Some old threads are useful and it would stop an influx of new threads just asking the same old tired questions. This warning should only used on repeat offenders if it pertains to spam (as it does here)

UniCreatures frame info currently only mentions the three action images but this is only for single creature link that is posted. There is a profile page that is posted by many people on here that would involve people possibly scrolling down a bit and clicking the creature image to bring up the familiar action images for that single creature.

This is great.. I came back to the site to get clicks and resumed my old behaviour (loading up all links possible in tabs and then letting them all load before doing required actions) and I now I find this new function and I haven't encountered anything to do with apart from the symbol (<10).

Do I need to alter my behaviour on site?

Yes it answers it perfectly thank you! I thought all clicks were counted as your average which is where my confusion stemmed from on this issue.

Today I have clicked 353 links so far (my history tells me so) yet in the dynasty exchange it is telling me that I have only clicked 127!

Is this something that normally happens as I cannot find a post with a problem like this at all on the forum. Plus it is something that is affecting my average in the dynasty.

- Just a little cut and paste to show you what I mean -

Who you have clicked today ? (354)

46 127 sociopath on daimyo