Author |
Message |
Topic: Human awarness Test |
Roman
Replies: 99
Views: 279955
|
Forum: Support - HowTos & FAQs Posted: Mon Jul 26, 2010 10:17 am Subject: Human awarness Test |
Polish added in starting post at:
http://yarold.eu/phpBB2/v...p?p=25327#25327 |
Topic: Fix Size Check |
Roman
Replies: 3
Views: 3139
|
Forum: Suggestions Posted: Thu Dec 17, 2009 4:47 pm Subject: Fix Size Check |
Kiwiana wrote: | I wrote the check notes down, it told me 41 good / 450 good. That's why I said fix them *sigh*. Third time of deleting, great. And yes I speak German, but I first need to get me back from being angry, then read your link, and then perhaps send a pm |
You have mail, lets see if we can handle the problem |
Topic: Fix Size Check |
Roman
Replies: 3
Views: 3139
|
Forum: Suggestions Posted: Thu Dec 17, 2009 4:21 pm Subject: Re: Fix Size Check |
Sorry, but they are stil to big
Height of short note is: 109 too big
And sooo..... the short note checker deleted your note again (in this case I started the checker)
Maybe this is the problem?:
http://yarold.eu/phpBB2/viewtopic.php?t=5848
You speak german, yes?
Me too, so you can also send me an ingame mail to see if I can help you fixing the problem. |
Topic: Human awarness Test |
Roman
Replies: 99
Views: 279955
|
Forum: Support - HowTos & FAQs Posted: Fri Oct 23, 2009 7:40 am Subject: Human awarness Test |
Romanian Translation added. (Translation by m41c41 from MOB Dynasty) |
Topic: Smilie Contest |
Roman
Replies: 84
Views: 51721
|
Forum: MMC UBC Posted: Mon Oct 05, 2009 2:00 pm Subject: Smilie Contest |
Ella wrote: | :grin: What a surprise! Thank you Tru Image |
Gratulations Ella
But this time I also entered the contest which means you cant win anymore, haha :p |
Topic: notes 2 |
Roman
Replies: 33
Views: 20533
|
Forum: Support - Ask here Posted: Mon Sep 28, 2009 8:35 am Subject: notes 2 |
May I remember you all, that I made the same mistake once?
http://yarold.eu/phpBB2/v...p?p=44778#44778
And I am not a kid
Well, at least I think so .... |
Topic: frank Metalteo |
Roman
Replies: 9
Views: 6412
|
Forum: Support - Ask here Posted: Wed Sep 23, 2009 2:02 pm Subject: frank Metalteo |
Ella wrote: | Yes, i think that is what Frank would have wanted.
This is in respect of him, thank you Stan. |
I second that ...... |
Topic: Site reset taking longer than normal |
Roman
Replies: 9
Views: 8344
|
Forum: Support - Ask here Posted: Wed Sep 23, 2009 8:46 am Subject: Site reset taking longer than normal |
the site is back working.... click! |
Topic: Site reset taking longer than normal |
Roman
Replies: 9
Views: 8344
|
Forum: Support - Ask here Posted: Wed Sep 23, 2009 7:59 am Subject: Site reset taking longer than normal |
dimidola wrote: | same here... any idea when it will be fixed? |
As soon as Stan wakes up and sees the million of postings and messages on his MSN account
Patience please!! |
Topic: Real money/prize "games" |
Roman
Replies: 15
Views: 8443
|
Forum: Support - Ask here Posted: Mon Sep 21, 2009 9:38 am Subject: Real money/prize "games" |
Xazy wrote: | ... my question is meant to ask if it is appropriate to allow links that potentially give you a real money prize. |
I fully understand what you mean. But, this is something Stan - as site owner - has to decide. |
Topic: Real money/prize "games" |
Roman
Replies: 15
Views: 8443
|
Forum: Support - Ask here Posted: Mon Sep 21, 2009 8:24 am Subject: Real money/prize "games" |
Jeanne wrote: | besides the cutest dog contest is over, Jasper won so the link holder isn't helping anyone anymore. |
Well, yes, Jasper won and now UC people vote for Kikka ...... |
Topic: where we are / update continued |
Roman
Replies: 141
Views: 61621
|
Forum: Support - Ask here Posted: Mon Sep 21, 2009 8:20 am Subject: where we are / update continued |
Jeanne wrote: | Maybe Stan hasn't been married and doesn't know the way to silence a woman is to give her what she wants |
..... and now - after that help from your side - he probably will never marry |
Topic: Real money/prize "games" |
Roman
Replies: 15
Views: 8443
|
Forum: Support - Ask here Posted: Fri Sep 18, 2009 11:37 am Subject: Re: Real money/prize "games" |
Xazy wrote: | Today I see in the exchange a link for cutestdogcompetition.com. This isn't a game... it's an actual contest where the winner receives a money prize... is this really an appropriate use of the link exchange? |
Hi!
That link was accepted by me. So if an Admin thinks, that I was wrong there feel free to delete the link again.
Imho it is a game where you need to get many clicks to your pet.
About animulet.net: I dont know ...
Roman |
Topic: Adding a link which needs to be checked |
Roman
Replies: 6
Views: 5374
|
Forum: Support - Ask here Posted: Tue Sep 15, 2009 11:47 am Subject: Adding a link which needs to be checked |
Eraethyr wrote: | At least the pets that only need feeds or views should be ok if I set them individually, I'll do that. Thanks for your help everyone. |
Yes, according to the rules I think this is the only good way for you .... |
Topic: Adding a link which needs to be checked |
Roman
Replies: 6
Views: 5374
|
Forum: Support - Ask here Posted: Tue Sep 15, 2009 11:32 am Subject: Adding a link which needs to be checked |
Eraethyr wrote: | Thanks DemonicJ, that is disappointing as promoting the profile gives views to the eggs I need to die so keeps them alive longer! |
Hi!
So why not adding the link to your egg cave profile?
Thats allowed! |
Topic: Showing links |
Roman
Replies: 57
Views: 30637
|
Forum: Support - Ask here Posted: Tue Sep 15, 2009 8:32 am Subject: Showing links |
Ella wrote: | I support the rule to have at least 1 link shown in main and history if you want to click on that page.
So, if i understand correct, i herewith have voted 'yes' |
Yes, and I voted NO because I read the sentence wrong.....
I said NO to deleting the rule instead of yes to support the rule.
(which both is the same but counts other way round)
Well .... I hope, that my wrong vote does not make problems now |
Topic: where we are / update continued |
Roman
Replies: 141
Views: 61621
|
Forum: Support - Ask here Posted: Thu Sep 10, 2009 8:38 am Subject: where we are / update continued |
bluebell_rose wrote: | And I was protesting the fact that one could theoritically gain a high avg and be at the top, without doing a single lick of clicks back in the new system, The new change is an attempt by stan to fix the flaw |
Just a big: YES!
Thats the same I was thinking and thats exactly why I like the new update!
Maybe its time to make a summary of the different updates:
Old System of Dyn/Ave:
It only counted what you click and not what you give back. If everyone is only interested in clicking links but not in showing links the clickers dont find a link to click
-> bad system!
Update - clicked links and received clicks count together:
The links you click and the received clicks get counted together. Very nice new system and much better then the old one, but it has a big diasadvantage:
The problem is, that people that have a lot of money and that want to spend money for Yarolds rule the ranking. If a person buys credits and shows 10 Links 24/7 in Main, History and Dynasty this person does not even need to click to have a high ranking. (10*400=4000 only in Dynasty and then maybe even the ones in History and Main. Maybe that will get together 6000 or 8000 received clicks? -> Clicking 0 = Average 3000 or 4000. Try to reach that without money )
Maybe you now say, great: Much money for Stan. Yes, but not in a long run, because if that starts many people will leave Yarolds including me (everyone who does not use money to show more links).
Newest update - the lower one counts:
The lower amount counts. The clicked links or the received clicks.
Buying credits still is nice but you also have to click a lot to get to the top.
With that update also feeder Dynasties are not that usefull anymore! Why?
Lets say I allie with a Feeder Dynasty. They show 10 Links 24/7 only in Dynasty and only I are allied with them! I get a lot of lcicks but have to low amount of received clicks -> I need to show my links to make it equal -> My other allies click me more and also need to show more to their allies to make themselves also equal. So in the end that credits of the feeder dynasties spread the Yarolds world. -> Feeder Dynasties are not that usefull anymore!
If anything above written is wrong, please let me know. Maybe we even find a better way to make it more better.
Thank you!
P.s.
I also often read, that its just needed to forbig transfers to avoid feeder Dynasties. yes, that would definately help but it would also kill the most fun on Yarolds.
- No contests anymore
- No helping of new members
- No helpings of non Vip members that get fast negative
- No possibilities to snd credits to valuabled members
- you can go on here .......
So in my opinion, forbidding to send credits is the most stupid way to stop feeder Dynasties! |
Topic: where we are / update continued |
Roman
Replies: 141
Views: 61621
|
Forum: Support - Ask here Posted: Wed Sep 09, 2009 1:34 pm Subject: where we are / update continued |
norrbotten wrote: | MinYday counts. Does that mean that if I'm off for one day or more, I'll have to remove my links?
As I see it I get clicked 1003 and click 0 => MinYday=0. Leaving them on doesn't do anything (positive or negative) for my average so I'll lose a lot of credits for nothing, or am I missing something here? |
Hi!
Yes, thats true and I have to admit, that I did not think about that case (On the other hand it was not any difference when Avg/day was counting because there also was only counting the done clicks and nothing else. Did you remove your link then? So actually no change there to the old system). -> Its true that then counts the 0.
But dont forget, that still the Average for "clicked links" and "received clicks" counts.
So as an example:
I am nearly never online on weekends:
What can I do?
1.) I can let my link in Dynasty (+History + Main) if I want over the weekend so I still get my clicks
2.) The Average of "clicked links" goes down and the average of "received clicks" stays where it was.
3.) From monday on I can clcik again to higher my "clicked links" but dont need to try to get that many "received clicks" - so I can lower that one a bit to make it more equal.
But agreed, its getting more and more complicated now ..... |
Topic: Way dynasties work |
Roman
Replies: 136
Views: 103993
|
Forum: Dynasty Discussion Posted: Wed Sep 09, 2009 7:43 am Subject: Way dynasties work |
jassej wrote: | Roman, difference between us is that you write about Yarold as EXCHANGE side and for me is Yarold game. |
Hello Jassej
For me its a game too else I wouldnt be here anymore. But Yarolds still also IS an exchange site.
jassej wrote: | Because somebody can show always all links just whan buy credit.
So he is not better, he just give more money for game.
And that for you fun? |
Thats why I sugested to only count the LOWER amount. "Received clicks" OR "done clicks". So even if you show 10 links 24/7 and recieve million of clicks you still will only be ranked what you click yourself. Money is not that imoortant then anymore.
jassej wrote: | About feeder dynastys, just delete than, is very simple!! |
Nice idea. But with which rules? Who takes care of following the rules? Just deleting them? Hey, this one feeds soeone, lets delete the whole Dynasty?
I already now know what happens, when Stan or Jay deletes the first Dynasty. Blamings all over Yarlds Forum ......
If there are definte rules, then its fine ....
So help us, define some rules which can be followed by everyone. |
Topic: Rank |
Roman
Replies: 14
Views: 13555
|
Forum: Dynasty Discussion Posted: Wed Sep 09, 2009 7:35 am Subject: Rank |
niinamaa wrote: | My opinion - the best is the 3rd version (rank is next to the name) |
Yes, but as own column which can be hidden if wanted (costumize) |
|