Search found 3 matches

I'm very sorry that there are some dynasties that seem unable to create or maintain relationships with allies. Why punish the rest that can?

There are some in the dynasty exchanges that are consistently clicking 450+ links a day. Is this why this will be implemented? Because there are some who are clicking many LINKS on a LINK EXCHANGE site?

The statement that there could be 5 allies to every dynasty for up to 300 members is interesting given that there are currently only 5 dynasties with 60+ members.

Yarold, this is your site and you can set the rules however you want them, however I suggest you listen to the people who use your site on this one. Limiting the number of links available to your users is like asking them to leave - really bad for business.

Sorry to revive an older thread, but my question is relevant to the subject.

I've noticed a problem with the 50 limitation.

Let's say that I have two links (I do) and someone clicks both (as they should), then the person is listed twice because the referring link is from a different area (minicity, outwar, etc.). The problem is that when they are listed twice, all their links are listed twice. This is true for any number of links that a person might have. This doubling is affecting the 50 limit count.

example: 1 person with 4 links clicks both my links - the history lists 8 links. If there are links that I do not wish to click are listed before the limit is reached, then I do not get to see the links I do want to click because of the limit.

Since I cannot normally click a link twice, why should it be listed twice? Is there any way to change this?

I searched on this and didn't find anything on it, so...

I've found a user that seems to have 5 links with 5 different Yarold link numbers, but all link to the same minicity.

Who should I PM with the information to find out if I am incorrect?