Search found 17 matches

If you'd ask me, I wouldn't have a problem with your having a new account, because I think you know why you first account was banned and I don't think you'll do it again - so why not having a new one. But the admins know more about that all then we do and I think they surley have a reason for that.

Edit: After having read other topics in this section, one can have an overall view about your accounts (and your brother)

Hm, I think you got a bit more than only 1 account, don't you? I already know lots of them.

So why do you create so many accounts.

The admins won't be very bored grace to you :mrgreen:

Wow, what's bitten you? No need to react in this way. It's just my opinion, as well as you can have yours. But if my post sounded to harsh and offended anyone, I apologize of course.

I think most of us know what this test is about. If not, it can be looked up in the forum (maybe it should be added to the faqs to have a short idea what the HAT is, otherwise you have to read a few pages of posts to find it out). :neutral:

In my experience, HAT appears 2-3 times a day (in average - sometimes less, sometimes more).

For some sites you need to enter certain digits to help the user. (I only remember that this is the case for Forwar, Futureminicity,...).
So if you want to help them you got to enter the numbers and letters, and if you don't, you won't help that much.

This is why I don't understand the complaints. Either you want to help someone and enter the digits (then you won't fail when a HAT appears and you'll be rewarded) or you decide not to help everyone (why should you get a reward then?)

And if the ones are honest clickers, then they will surely help each other, won't they?

Yes, the last banners lasted fonly a certain time. But the one we want to keep should last at least a bit longer than the predecessors :wink:

I personaly liked the one with the small statues best, but the new ones are great too :mrgreen:

But bosh is the one to decide. He will be online soon. Then we'll know more about this issue

It looks really good. I like it, too :grin:

All right. Now I know that. Thank you for your help. :grin:

They show up in the others' history though they never clicked the new links??

Hm, that could be the reason for that :neutral:

I have another question.
Today I noticed something strange.

I wanted to prepare some links for the upcomming server restart, so I added several links (as many too).
But I didn't want to show them until one hour before server restart. So more dynasty members could benefit from it and I woundn't lose too many credits. And so I didn't activate the 'show dyasty' and the 'show main' box.

But then, I lost several hundred credits (well, it was all of them to be accurate) :neutral:

They all just disappeared not even within a minute. At the moment, I have enough to be safe from <-1>, but do you know what this was and why it happend?

All right. That's what I wanted to know :smile:

Do you mean after server restart on friday @ 00:00AM?? (I think it's central time).
In Germany, Italy, France... it's at 07:00 (Central Europe Time)

Don't know if s.o. could interpret it differently, just to be sure :mrgreen:

Good question. I asked me that today, too.
But I don't know whether a higher rate is good or a lower one.

Well, I really can't figure out the purpose.
A little instruction or explanation (from someone who knows the meaning) would be great :grin:

As far as I can see it, we got 3 dynasties with 60+ members and RMV with almost 100 members. :cool:

I'm not in favor of that idea to cut down the number of members, but I'm not against it though. Surely the smaller dynasties have a better chance and the ranking is more "balanced", and this is good for them. But, as already mentioned, it forces many loyal and good members and friends to leave their dynasties (which noone can support).

But if the restiction to 60 members became a rule, then the dynasties over 60 should get adequate time to "downgrade" their numbers. (i.e. a dynasty with 100 members should have a larger period to get to 60 members then an dynasty with 61 members). And adequate doesn't mean just over the night. So it is a bit more moderate for them (nevertheless it is not good for them).
Just to be a bit diplomatic :wink:

But I'm not the one to decide, luckily.

Hmm, have the same problem. I can only see the first line in the 'dynasty exchange' window. And it's the same case when opening the 'history' and the 'click exchange'.

Don't know why

But I think it's gonna be fixed soon :wink:

Not from England, but from Germany (east of Munich) :cool:

This is a multicultural Dynasty :mrgreen: