bluebell_rose - Sat Aug 29, 2009 9:05 pm Post subject: senseless fight ignoring warrnings
yes, I would rather you have that dababes. The mob rarely feeds their newbies, Instead we train them how to click. Training members is better no? Instead of feeding them when they go neg? hmmm? boots63 - Sat Aug 29, 2009 9:33 pm why do you ask about the 5 big dynasty, if i count exactly it's 6!!!! i'm very disapointing that you don't considere yet la brute as a top dynasty though, she had the fourth score yesterday, 50 members and she will probabely have a better one un few days.... jassej - Sat Aug 29, 2009 9:55 pm
Sorry, you have right, now we have big 6. But you are against feeder dynasty or? boots63 - Sat Aug 29, 2009 10:39 pm lyou don't remember but i answer no before i prefer helping members to be better and to have good care by sending them credits that send credits to have more extra links. it's so, that the dynasty la brute is now a big dynasty as you say. DemonicJ - Sun Aug 30, 2009 8:23 am
Who is this other feeder dynasty your alluding too? Ella - Sun Aug 30, 2009 10:33 am
kevin-Clicker. If i am not allowed to quote a pm, then delete it.
As i said in the beginning of this thread, i am against all forms of feeder dynasties. This form is a variation of the feeder dynastie we are discussing. OK, no credits are send, but the links are only shared with the Mother dynasty and not with the allies. DemonicJ - Sun Aug 30, 2009 11:23 am That lasted as long as hippies haven was a 1 ally dynasty. *Hippies Haven now has allies, but for a little while there was allied to only one dynasty. kevin-clicker was dropped as an ally a dsay or so ago Ella - Sun Aug 30, 2009 12:20 pm 09/08/16 -- was my second attempt to ally. Days before i also did, but deleted that request because i got no answer. Before that first request, 'Kevin-clicker' already existed. 09/08/21 -- received the mail, mentioned in my previous post. Hippies Haven was a 1 member dynasty for 1 or 2 days max. So everyone could request alliance soon after that, since 2 member dynasties are visible on the all dynasty alliances table. OK, guilty (?!) .because we knew Hippies Haven would open its doors again, we where the first to ally. DaBabes City - Tue Sep 01, 2009 12:39 am
Why didn't you protest our mentoring and funding our trainees with purchased credits while you were allied with us? Could this be because our gained/given difference was widening because of your many negatives and those same credits were enabling you to overtake and replace us in second place, hmmm? 
From my Short Notes: Valenth is down for two of our members. My own nine extra links are open! If you object to purchased credits, please ignore my links! My definition of a negative? A debt not paid, a promise not kept! We mentor and aid our members to stay positive, and give our Allies full value! hippie - Tue Sep 01, 2009 3:54 am Hippies Haven was allied to Net Freaks, Untouchables and the moblets while I was away. They were my first ally of the day, what a surprise, I came from NetFreaks and allied with them first. The same day I allied with Moblets and Untouchables because they were good allies before and had room for me. RMV sent me an ally request but when I went to click it, it was gone because they had grown too big. Why don't you get your facts straight before you post DemonicJ. It just makes you look bad when you don't have your facts straight. DemonicJ - Tue Sep 01, 2009 4:27 am
09/08/21 19:30:02 OctoberIvy Made changes to: description: Old=Looking For Consistant Clickers To Get Our Dynasty Going New=On vacation for 9 days, hope to have some ally requests by the time we get back. 09/08/21 19:29:15 Hippie is now a new emperor 09/08/21 19:28:27 Hippie has joined the dynasty 09/08/20 22:22:14 Hippie accepted aliance with dynasty 09/08/20 22:11:49 OctoberIvy Dynasty is founded, Good luck Short note from your other member when you made the dynasty again "Welcome NetFreaks, you are the best. Hippie and I will be on vacation Saturday August 22 - Sunday August 30. We will leave some links open for you to enjoy." Was replying to the comment Ella made "As i said in the beginning of this thread, i am against all forms of feeder dynasties." Was the 22nd when you got your 2nd alliance. Not arguing the validity of your dynasty, was countering someone elses remark about 'any form of feeder dynasties'.
With mainly the same allies we were catching you & looking like taking 2nd place? Guess that shows you paying...erm I mean mentoring your members wasnt that effective. Difference in given gained ratio, guess that just shows up your guys as being inneffective that they couldnt click the extra's from your funding. we know our given gained was better than some of your other allies as well, but thats ok. You wouldnt allow us to get 2nd, thats ok, we helped another ally of ours get to 2nd. For the record, we did protest, even while allied with you. |
