Yarold - Fri Nov 21, 2008 8:27 pm Post subject: Wich option you like (2nd round) First round ended with results available here No option got more than 50% so we have 2nd round with options most often chosen in 1st round. Question remains unchanged "How would you like dynasties to be sorted by default" : - current AvgClicks ( 38% in last poll) - old aveday ( 32% in last poll) Yarold - Sat Nov 22, 2008 1:08 am . Ferrari - Sat Nov 22, 2008 1:21 am Come on people, give your opinion, we must get over 50% this time. DashaBlade - Sat Nov 22, 2008 1:37 am Hey, I think the way it is now, where you can sort it however you want, is cool. That way one dynasty is #1 in average, one is #1 in total clicks, etc. There's no need to be #1 in everything. Cheryl - Sat Nov 22, 2008 2:19 am
I agree. I voted for AvgClicks as we can still see the Ave too. I really like this one if people aren't able to click, be on vacation, etc, they can just be a peasant temporarily. This has worked out very well in our dynasty in my opinion. turdkey - Sat Nov 22, 2008 6:09 am With only 93 votes, in the first round, out of a total membership of god knows how many was this second round really worth the effort ? Without a none of the above option I abstain from voting. Ferrari - Sat Nov 22, 2008 6:17 am
yes great option, no more kicking, thats why i vote that one also. MUSHpark - Sat Nov 22, 2008 6:39 am
yvonne - Sat Nov 22, 2008 6:45 am choose what you want i am here to click so am looking further for links bye 70Chevelle - Sat Nov 22, 2008 7:43 am the only issue I have with the way it is now - is that some dynasties are all ready talking about merging and making the biggest dynasties they can - it does not matter one bit that we can sort - whatever default it is set to is what people are going to go by - as far as clicks not counting on peasants - unless I misunderstood the update (which is possible) the peasants don't count on any thing anymore Darrel - Sat Nov 22, 2008 9:03 am Current Avg Clicks Donas - Sat Nov 22, 2008 9:18 am Current average clicks Roman - Sat Nov 22, 2008 9:29 am
Yep jassej - Sat Nov 22, 2008 10:54 am Old aveday engelina - Sat Nov 22, 2008 11:53 am
same here. maxi - Sat Nov 22, 2008 1:12 pm Current average clicks lobster - Sat Nov 22, 2008 2:27 pm Current AveClicks. pinestka81 - Sat Nov 22, 2008 2:49 pm current AvgClicks iruleville - Sat Nov 22, 2008 3:16 pm The present system favours the larger Dynasties and isn't fair on Dynasties with only a handful of members. Another option would be that only the daily average of the Emperor counts which, of course, would mean that my Emperor would sweep the floor with the rest of them. 
carlo-patti - Sat Nov 22, 2008 3:18 pm Current average clicks 
tusseries - Sat Nov 22, 2008 3:27 pm Current AvgClicks
Divan - Sat Nov 22, 2008 4:27 pm I think the way it is now, where you can sort it however you want, is cool. That way one dynasty is #1 in average, one is #1 in total clicks, etc. There's no need to be #1 in everything. ok? Jeff - Sat Nov 22, 2008 5:45 pm I am really apathetic concerning this. I really only come here to see friends, click links and be clicked. I voted the way people I respect asked me to vote or I saw they voted. The way I see it, My dynasty RMV will always be the best no matter what it ranks in the numbers game. Love ya! Jeff zoran33 - Sat Nov 22, 2008 6:09 pm old aveday sebastopol-ca - Sat Nov 22, 2008 7:41 pm OK, voted, but choose to keep it to myself And I agree with turdkey, there should have been a 3rd option, the 3rd highest from the 1st poll.
minh-phuoc - Sat Nov 22, 2008 8:39 pm
Oh yes, I agree with you, RMV is always the best for all of our members, we are a big family. Thanks dear Jeff and love ya too 
Jeanne - Sat Nov 22, 2008 9:55 pm
That wouldn't be fair either - a high average comes from having the best allies and the most time to spend online. I liked the old ave system - despite it was possible to (ab)use it by forming micro-dynasties with few high ave members - it was possible to compete regardless whether your dynasty had 20 -40 or 60 members. The new click system favours only the larger dynasties and makes it hard for new starting dynasties or dynasties who like being medium size - these will either be swallowed by larger dynasties or die for lack of allies. I vote for the old ave sorting as default and as I understand - this is only about which sorting will show as default the other sorting options will still be there so will the "peasants doesn't count" and all other new things from the latest update - I understand all we vote for here is what should show first when we enter dynasty page - nothing else will change - or will it Stan? thepossum1 - Sat Nov 22, 2008 10:43 pm  bing--the light just went on for me. I didn't vote this go 'round. Seems pointless.
Jeanne, I think you're correct--all we are voting on is what is the default view on the dynasties page!! Personally, who gives a rat's behind if I have to click to re-sort?? If all other changes that have been made in this last update remain ( I REALLLLLLY like having the option of peasant not counting rather than having to boot), what is actually changing? Nothing. pfft...too busy clicking to worry about this 
engelina - Sat Nov 22, 2008 10:48 pm yes, as long as the peasants do not count rule and other changes stays, i don't mind at all how the page is sorted. dreamsattown - Sat Nov 22, 2008 11:34 pm Old aveday Ella - Sun Nov 23, 2008 2:51 am Sorry, maybe i overlooked it and it is already said, Whatever the new system will be, remains that the maximum size of the dynasties( 60 ?) is too big. Or.... the maximum of total 400 must be set to a higher number. TiddaMouse - Sun Nov 23, 2008 3:02 am
Probably a discussion for a seperate thread, not really what the poll is about, There is nothing wrong with the current maximum numbers. It used to be a max of 100 within a Dynasty and at one stage it was 350 max for allies. Dynasty number was lowered to 60 and the maximum members within alliance raised to 400. The current numbers allow you to have 6 maxed out dynasties with room to spare for a smaller dyn or two. Or even Many smaller ones if that is what you prefer. I am happy with the current numbers, there is no reason to change them. Everyone just needs to find their own balance. Wildthing - Sun Nov 23, 2008 5:01 pm I like the new avg way as opposed to the old! barymore - Sun Nov 23, 2008 6:35 pm I voted for current aveclicks 70Chevelle - Sun Nov 23, 2008 11:39 pm so here we go - massive dynasties - and few allies - I couldn't care less what the "rankings" are but I like to get plenty of clicks and credits for myself - going to be hard now unless you are part of a huge dynasty where you don't know anyone - and where is the fun in that? - sad really cowapanda - Mon Nov 24, 2008 9:14 am I'd like the way it is now. 
zvonimir - Mon Nov 24, 2008 1:50 pm That very bad .. Now we will not have anti-dynasti .. You'll minus-dynasty .. Why is this vote was secret and not publicly? jkcove08 - Mon Nov 24, 2008 2:27 pm It was public, I saw it first thing Friday, I was #5 voting. Then several of our members put a reminder to vote again in thier short notes. Ferrari - Mon Nov 24, 2008 2:28 pm
secret? this poll was here all the time
zvonimir - Mon Nov 24, 2008 2:58 pm
I know that the polls here a long time ago. It is quite another meaning between public and secret ballot!! jkcove08 - Mon Nov 24, 2008 3:59 pm Zvonimir, we all realize that you along with the members of UBC feel that you have been wronged. The crazy thing is when I told Jassej that I was leaving because all of the members wanted to be first he told me he would rather I stay then be first. I told him that was nice but the members wanted it. You were first for a day. The thing is, this is Yarolds site. He can change it when he wants and to what he wants. When changes are made instead of whinning that you got screwed, do something to change it. Add more people, find better alliances, what ever it takes. If you knew that this poll was up you should have been telling everyone that you knew to vote. If you dont like it create your own site, listen to all of the members who dont have to do all of the work grumble that they dont like this or dont like that...... Life goes on figure it out. Jenn jassej - Wed Nov 26, 2008 11:06 pm
Uf ... sharp words ... was it necessary? UBC members are obviously unhappy, carefully if we are 1 are also changes come! And I'm sure the Yarold be happy about any positive but also negative criticism because the only way possible improvements are good. And of course I want to 1, but 1 space is only sweet and fair when it with all members / friends reaches! Yarold - Thu Nov 27, 2008 12:28 am
I'm only disappointed that no dynasty related disscussion was ever finished, but cut somewhere in middle. Everyone could create vote like this one. |
